I recently was looking to get a loan for a self-storage development. Here were the two options I had:
Option 1:
10% down
SBA portion of the loan: 5.4% fixed interest rate for 25 years on 40% of the project costs. Prepayment penalty of decreasing rate from 10% to 1% over the first 10 years of the loan. Loan is assumable, however.
Credit Union portion of the loan: 5.5% fixed interest rate of prime rate plus 0.75% once construction is done and loan can be locked in. 25 year amortization with a balloon after 5 years. Prime + 0.7% after that if another 5 year term can't be negotiated. 6.0% interest only during construction. No prepayment penalty. $7800 in closing costs, plus 20 included draws for the title company to pay construction costs - this is probably a $3000 value as they typically cost about $150 each.
Option 2:
10% down
SBA portion of the loan: 5.4% fixed interest rate for 25 years on 40% of the project costs. Prepayment penalty of decreasing rate from 10% to 1% over the first 10 years of the loan. Loan is assumable, however.
Bank portion of the loan: 5.45% fixed interest rate of prime rate plus 0.7% once construction is done and loan can be locked in. 25 year amortization with a balloon after 5 years. No additional guarantee of rate or terms after the initial 5 years. 5.45% interest only during construction. Prepayment penalty for the 5 years decreasing from 5% year one to 1% in year 5. If an additional 5 year term is negotiated after the initial 5 year term, another prepayment penalty from 5% - 1% will be in effect. Bank had 0.25% closing cost plus title fees (probably around $8,000) but weren't able to give me any free draws for the construction period.
Initially, I loved Option 1. And then I initially loved Option 2 more due to lower interest rate for the construction period and rent-up. What I didn't like about Option 2 was the lack of perceived flexibility it gave me. It seemed very restricting with the prepayment penalties without the assumable loan. I also didn't like the uncertainty of having nothing to fall back on after year 5 when the balloon came due. No adjustable rate mortgage, no additional 5 year term, nothing. I felt a little bit naked, so to speak. In the end Option 2 changed their term to allow for a 5/1 ARM with a prime plus 0.7% rate but wouldn't remove the prepayment penalty after the initial 5 years. They allowed me to sell the property without penalty, but not refinance. I struggled with that option although if it were my only option, it probably wouldn't be terrible.
My philosophy on the overall market and interest rate conditions are this: I think interest rates are going to go up a little but I think the treasury is going to do a lot of monetary tightening. What this means to me is that I don't think interest rates will get too inflated but I think free cash will tighten a lot. That may make it tough for me to get a new loan once mine expires. Therefore I want some sort of safety net of an ARM for as long as I need to get a new 5 year fixed rate. If I can't get another 5 year fixed rate due to fiscal tightening by the government and federal reserve, I want to make sure I have a mechanism for keeping the loan going as a safety net. I could be wrong, but this is my main concern. BTW, I think this will slightly impede our current economic tailwind (similar to raising interest rates) to keep the economy from getting too inflated too fast. It might actually stifle growth a bit. If things are stifled more than a "bit", I want to have protection. I think I'll be making plenty of rent, but I know interest rates are going to pinch me a little and I don't need the added headache of a big balloon payment I can't get a loan on. Anyhow, maybe I'm too worried about the downside, but I want to be super conservative in the down direction.
I asked Option 1 to match the interest rate and reduce the interest-only rate for the construction and rent-up period. They were able to do that so I was able to go with them. I really felt confident I'd be able to renegotiate a new 5 year deal that was favorable after the initial 5 year term and if I couldn't, I had the 1 year adjustable rate to fall back on (which the Bank also was willing to do). The biggest selling point for me was the lack of a prepayment penalty. If I had to refi for some reason, I would only have to pay the SBA prepayment penalty. We are talking about having the potential to save $50,000 when I'd probably need the money the most. Anyway, like I mentioned before, I was thinking of worst-case scenario stuff here and I just felt way more comfortable going this route.
In the end, both offers were really pretty great but I was able to take a loan that I thought gave me the most flexibility going forward. Not to mention, very low closing costs once the 5 year initial term wrapped up.
No comments:
Post a Comment